GEO Group wins legal challenge to California ban on private immigrant prisons By Reuters
Stock Markets 31 minutes ago (Sep 26, 2022 07:45PM ET)
By Daniel Wiessner
(Reuters) -A U.S. appeals court on Monday struck down California’s ban on privately-run immigrant detention centers in a challenge brought by private prison operator GEO Group Inc and the Biden administration.
The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said California’s 2019 ban gave the state too much control over how the federal government handles immigrant detainees.
A federal judge in San Diego had upheld the state law in 2020, ruling that California could prohibit private detention centers because federal law does not explicitly allow for them.
The 9th Circuit, in an 8-3 decision, said the government has come to rely almost exclusively on detention centers operated by GEO Group and other companies. California, the largest U.S. state, does not have the authority to interfere with the federal government’s operations, the court said.
About 80% of immigrants awaiting deportation hearings are held in private facilities, according to the American Civil Liberties Union and other advocacy groups. Most are operated by GEO Group and rival CoreCivic (NYSE:CXW) Inc, but dozens are owned by smaller companies.
GEO Group and the U.S. Department of Justice did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The California Attorney General’s office in a statement said it was disappointed with the ruling. The state could ask the U.S. Supreme Court to take up the case.
The ban “was enacted to protect the health and welfare of Californians and recognized the federal government’s own documented concerns with for-profit, private prisons and detention facilities,” the AG’s office said.
Immigrant advocates have said private facilities often are overcrowded and understaffed, subjecting detainees to inhumane conditions.
While campaigning for the 2020 election, Biden said he wanted to end the use of private detention centers to house immigrants. But Biden did not mention the detention of immigrants in a 2021 executive order limiting the federal government’s reliance on private criminal prisons, which drew criticism from advocacy groups.
California’s law prohibits the operation of any private detention facilities in the state, including prisons, but the lawsuits only challenged the ban on immigrant detention centers.
The dissenting 9th Circuit judges on Monday said the law should be upheld because it applies to private companies such as GEO Group and only indirectly regulates the federal government.
GEO Group wins legal challenge to California ban on private immigrant prisons
BUENOS AIRES (Reuters) – Units of Argentina’s state oil firm YPF will next month begin lithium exploration in a first-ever entry into the sector by state-run miners as the…
By Nate Raymond BOSTON (Reuters) -Biogen Inc has finalized a $900 million settlement resolving a whistleblower lawsuit accusing the biotech company of paying doctors kickbacks to…
By Oliver Gray
Investing.com – U.S. stock futures were trading higher during Monday’s evening deals, after major benchmark indices extended declines for the 5th consecutive…
(C) 2007-2022 Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.