Prosecutors in Sam Bankman-Fried trial compare defense argument to ‘Dumb and Dumber’

Prosecutors in Sam Bankman-Fried’s trial compared the defense’s argument to the Farrelly brothers movie “Dumb and Dumber”. They argued that the defense seemed like the characters Lloyd and Harry, using “fanciful” logic to make their case. The prosecutors argued that the defense’s argument lacked legal validity, suggesting that it was no better a case than the two slapstick characters in the popular movie.

READ ALSO

Related Posts

Next Post

    Join our mailing list to get access to special deals, promotions, and insider information. Your exclusive benefits await! Enjoy personalized recommendations, first dibs on sales, and members-only content that makes you feel like a true VIP. Sign up now and start saving!

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.