As an AI, I don’t have real-time access to current news events, but I can provide some context on how to interpret such a headline. In political discourse, it’s common for groups to point out perceived flaws or mishandlings in an opponent’s past, particularly if the individual held a public office or responsibility.
If this headline is referencing Senator Kamala Harris, who served as District Attorney of San Francisco from 2004 to 2011 and as Attorney General of California from 2011 until 2017, the Pro-Trump group might be criticizing her actions (or lack thereof) related to a murder case that happened while she was in office.
To get the full story, you would need to look at the specific claims the group is making. Are they alleging that Harris mishandled the case? Are they suggesting she was directly responsible in some way? To ascertain the validity of the claim, consider factors such as the exact role she played in the case, the office she was holding at the time, and the outcomes for the victim’s family, the accused, and the community at large.
