David Marcus’s assertion that Teamsters members view Trump, not Harris, as the genuine advocate for the working-class is essentially grounded on the former president’s appeal to working-class anxieties.
One of the main points Marcus likely argues is that Trump’s America-first economic policies, particularly his efforts against outsourcing, resonate strongly with working-class voters. During his tenure, Trump often touted job creation, curtailment of free trade agreements, and the imposition of tariffs to protect American industries. Many Teamsters members, who are part of a labor union of blue-collar workers, may perceive these measures as benefiting their livelihoods.
Another potential argument is Trump’s charisma and anti-establishment stance. His pointed rhetoric against the “elite” and his ostensible distance from mainstream politics may have connected with the Teamsters. These workers may harbor a sense of resentment towards the political class, which they could believe has neglected their interests.
As for Kamala Harris, Marcus might hint that her progressive policies and academic background align her more with the socio-political elites rather than the working class. Her image and ideology may seem alienating to some Teamsters who find it hard to relate with a political figure from such a starkly different socioeconomic background.
However, it should be noted that Marcus’s viewpoint is not universally applicable to every member of the Teamsters or the working class in general. There is a considerable variation within these demographics, many of whose members might very well support policies from the Democratic camp, including those championed by
