Stocks are trading in their historically weakest month, even as the S&P 500 remains up roughly 22% from its March lows.
The rally masks a severe imbalance has opened between the buying power systematic funds have left and the forced selling they could unleash if prices drop.
Bank of America estimated the size of that gap, and the disparity favors sellers by a wide margin now that September is underway, as reported by BigGo Finance.
Citadel Securities confirmed that the structural backdrop has shifted against equity buyers, with systematic strategies having rebuilt exposure to near-capacity levels since July. The data maps the fault lines that could turn a modest decline into something steeper.
The mechanics behind Bank of America’s $163 billion forced-selling estimate
Bank of America estimates that commodity trading advisers (CTAs) and volatility-control strategies retain only about $9 billion of buying capacity if stocks rise, BigGo Finance reported.
If markets decline instead, those same strategies could generate up to $163 billion in forced selling, creating an 18-to-1 imbalance.
The figure represents a scenario tied to a significant decline, because actual flows depend on the speed of any pullback.
The bank’s model assumes CTA assets under management of approximately $300 billion and volatility-control strategies each managing about $200 billion.
Deutsche Bank data support the crowding concern, showing that volatility-control strategy equity allocations have reached the 100th historical percentile.
Goldman Sachs estimates global CTA net long equity exposure at approximately $146.5 billion, near the top of its historical range, the report noted.
Citadel Securities warns systematic buying capacity has largely been consumed
Scott Rubner, head of equity and equity derivatives strategy at Citadel Securities, traced the imbalance to the speed of the July recovery in a note to clients.
Declining volatility after the July selloff created the capacity for systematic strategies to re-enter equity exposures, and the rebuild consumed much of the buying buffer, the firm reported.
Rubner characterized the month as a “tactical downside window,” the firm’s report noted.
More Bank of America:
- Bank of America sends sharp August stock market warning
- Bank of America CEO warns inflation will back the Fed into a corner
- Bank of America just made a strong call on inflation, economy
The options market reflects that compressed positioning, with the gap between the cost of downside protection and upside bets on the S&P 500 at its narrowest of the past year, the firm noted.
The VIX had fallen to 14.1 by late August, its lowest level of the year, before drifting higher as September began, Citadel Securities noted.
Bloomberg / Getty Images
Fund outflows and a shifting buyback mix weaken two pillars of steady demand
Investors withdrew a net $11.12 billion from U.S. equity funds in the week ended September 2, the second consecutive weekly outflow, Reuters reported.
The prior week saw $22.72 billion in net withdrawals as rising bond yields and Middle East tensions weighed on investor risk appetite.
Large-cap equity funds accounted for $7.52 billion of the selling, with technology sector funds recording $1.39 billion in separate withdrawals, Reuters confirmed.
Corporate share repurchases, one of the most consistent structural sources of equity demand, are also entering a seasonal slowdown across the market.
Rebekah McMillan, associate portfolio manager at Neuberger Berman, warned in an Invezz report that the largest AI-focused spenders cut repurchases by 32% to fund data-center buildouts, while financial companies lifted buybacks to a record $287 billion.
<strong>The marginal buyer of US equities is now more cyclical and more credit-sensitive</strong>
Passive fund investors pulling cash while buyback demand shifts toward more cyclical sectors removes two stabilizing forces at the same time.
More than $1.1 trillion in announced buyback authorizations had moved back into an open trading window through August. But the pre-earnings blackout window begins to accelerate around September 12, according to Citadel Securities.
Hartnett and Rubner see positioning stress lasting through September
Bank of America strategist Michael Hartnett has flagged this positioning risk for months through the firm’s Bull and Bear Indicator, a proprietary gauge of crowding.
The indicator has remained in sell-signal territory since May 2026, with July weekly readings ranging from 9.5 to 9.6 on a 10-point scale before climbing to 9.7 in early August, its highest levels since 2021, Bloomberg reported.
Rubner suggested that a more constructive re-entry point could emerge around mid-October if September delivers the expected positioning reset, the report indicated.
Rubner wrote that exhausted systematic buying capacity and cheap downside protection have created “an asymmetric opportunity” for investors looking to hedge S&P 500 exposure. One-month 25-delta downside protection is now at its cheapest level since December 2024.
Separate risk frameworks converge on the same positioning
Bank of America’s CTA flow model, Deutsche Bank’s historical percentile ranking, and Goldman Sachs’ net long estimate use different inputs. Yet all three locate systematic equity exposure at or near the ceiling of its historical range.
That cross-firm convergence is uncommon and narrows the range of outcomes for how these strategies behave if volatility rises.
The catalysts Rubner identified, nonfarm payrolls and the September FOMC meeting, landed within days of the buyback blackout acceleration around September 12. That timing compresses several potential pressure points into roughly a two-week stretch.
Related: Bank of America sends wake-up call to Meta stock investors
