U.S. District Judge Percy Anderson also ordered Iza to pay $23.4 million in restitution. Iza pleaded guilty in January 2025 to conspiracy against rights, wire fraud and tax evasion and has been in federal custody since September 2024.
The sentence will run concurrently with the 15-year federal prison term Iza received in Connecticut in September for helping coordinate an attempted Bitcoin robbery and kidnapping in August 2024. FinanceFeeds previously reported on the government’s efforts to forfeit nearly $1 million in assets linked to Iza, including cash, vehicles, luxury goods and a $275,000 watch.
How Did Iza Extract More Than $37 Million From Meta?
The Meta scheme ran from December 2020 through September 2024. Prosecutors said Iza fraudulently obtained access to Meta Business Manager accounts and their associated advertising credit lines, then sold access to those compromised accounts to advertising companies.
From 2020 through 2022, companies controlled by Iza received approximately $37 million from domestic and international payors connected with the sale of that access. Meta customers were subsequently billed for advertising expenditures they had not authorized.
When Meta or its customers detected the fraudulent charges, Meta reimbursed affected clients and absorbed the losses, according to prosecutors.
Iza admitted receiving at least $36.36 million in gross income from the Meta fraud between 2020 and 2023. Prosecutors calculated the resulting tax loss to the Internal Revenue Service at approximately $13.29 million.
Investor Takeaway
The case was not primarily a cryptocurrency fraud. The underlying revenue came from compromised advertising accounts, while crypto custodians became part of the financial trail as Iza attempted to conceal income and ownership. For financial firms, that distinction matters when assessing how digital asset infrastructure can intersect with fraud originating outside crypto markets.
Where Did Cryptocurrency Enter the Fraud and Tax Case?
Prosecutors said Iza concealed his ownership of a company called Zort and failed to file corporate tax returns while moving corporate income to cryptocurrency custodians. He also used a co-conspirator to purchase personal items with company funds.
The crypto transfers did not constitute the underlying Meta fraud, but they became part of the government’s tax-evasion case because prosecutors said they were used while Iza concealed income and corporate ownership.
The financial investigation has extended beyond digital assets. Federal authorities have pursued cash, vehicles, watches, designer goods and other property connected to Iza. That asset-recovery effort illustrates how investigators increasingly follow money across both cryptocurrency platforms and conventional assets rather than treating digital assets as a separate financial system.
Similar tracing issues appear across crypto-related prosecutions. FinanceFeeds recently covered a Coinbase impersonation scheme that stole nearly $16 million from around 100 users, demonstrating how investigators must often trace funds after victims are induced to move assets across wallets and accounts.
Investor Takeaway
Crypto custody platforms can become evidence points in cases that begin with conventional wire fraud, tax evasion or other crimes. Transaction tracing, account ownership records and links between digital assets and purchases in the traditional economy increasingly form part of the same enforcement process.
How Did Sheriff’s Deputies Become Part of the Case?
Between August 2021 and April 2022, Iza hired off-duty Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department deputies to provide private security. He admitted conspiring with deputies to obtain confidential law-enforcement records, personally identifiable information and search warrants used to locate and harass people with whom he had financial or personal disputes.
Five former deputies employed by Iza have now been convicted of federal crimes. Their cases included civil-rights violations, false search-warrant applications, obstruction and tax offenses.
FinanceFeeds has followed those proceedings, including the 63-month sentence imposed on former deputy Michael Coberg for his role in an extortion and false-arrest scheme connected to Iza, and the later 18-month sentence for former deputy Scott Simpkins for obstructing the federal investigation.
Why Is Iza Already Serving a 15-Year Sentence?
The California sentence is only one part of Iza’s criminal exposure. In a separate Connecticut prosecution, he pleaded guilty to conspiracy to interfere with commerce by robbery after admitting involvement in an attempted Bitcoin robbery that led to the kidnapping of two people in Danbury in August 2024.
He received 15 years in federal prison for that case in September. Because Judge Anderson ordered the new 78-month term to run concurrently, the California sentence does not add another six and a half years after completion of the Connecticut term.
Investor Takeaway
Iza’s case combines cyber-enabled fraud, tax concealment, physical coercion and cryptocurrency-linked crime rather than fitting neatly into a single category. The continuing forfeiture process will determine how much property authorities ultimately recover in addition to the prison sentences and restitution order.
