• Terms and conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Tuesday, April 21, 2026
Informed American Today
No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Stock Market
  • Editor’s Choice
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Stock Market
  • Editor’s Choice
No Result
View All Result
Morning News
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics

House Democrats open probe into FBI’s handling of Epstein documents

informedamericantoday by informedamericantoday
April 20, 2026
in Politics
0
House Democrats open probe into FBI’s handling of Epstein documents

House Judiciary Committee Democrats have announced they are probing the FBI over whether Director Kash Patel is willfully refusing to disclose information related to Jeffrey Epstein.

‘Who exactly are you protecting by refusing to release the Epstein files? In 2023, on Benny Johnson’s podcast, you were asked why the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) was ‘protecting the world’s foremost predator’ by refusing to release the Epstein client list. Your answer: ‘Simple. Because of who’s on that list,” Democratic lawmakers, led by ranking member Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., wrote.

READ ALSO

Midterm alarm bells: Democrats face steep favorability deficit despite election gains

Trump’s apocalyptic Iran warning raises stakes for sweeping US strike threat

‘Now that you are the Director of the FBI, you know precisely who is implicated in the Epstein files, yet you refuse to release them. Who are you protecting and why?’

The letter pointed to several occasions where Patel called for transparency in Epstein’s case, including his statement soon after taking the role, ‘There will be no cover-ups, no missing documents, and no stone left unturned — and anyone from the prior or current Bureau who undermines this will be swiftly pursued.’

‘Strangely, all these promises appear to have collapsed once you determined who was actually in the files,’ the Democrats wrote.

They also referenced a New York Times report that detailed hundreds of people pouring over thousands of documents related to Epstein.

‘This frantic review by nearly 1,000 agents of over 100,000 pages of investigative material apparently revealed no information worthy of disclosure to the American public— however, at least some information from the review was shared with President Trump. In May, Attorney General Bondi reportedly informed President Trump that his name indeed appeared repeatedly in the Epstein files,’ the letter said.

‘Obvious questions abound: why were so many agents tasked with reviewing documents that were never released? What specific instructions were they given during the review? What information did these agents uncover that led DOJ and FBI to reverse their promise to release the files, and how are these decisions related to the President?’

President Donald Trump himself denied being told that his name was in any files related to Epstein in late July.

‘No, I was never, never briefed. No,’ the president said at the time.

It was never reported in what context Trump’s name may have appeared, however. It’s known that the two were friendly before a falling out in the early 2000s, though Trump has never been implicated in any wrongdoing related to Epstein’s crimes.

Trump himself directed the Department of Justice (DOJ) to release grand jury transcripts related to Epstein, and Attorney General Pam Bondi subsequently had her deputy interview Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell in a Florida prison.

Trump has also called the furor surrounding Epstein a ‘hoax’ on multiple occasions.

The DOJ has since turned over thousands of documents related to Epstein to the House Oversight Committee.

Convicted sex offender Epstein committed suicide in 2019 while awaiting prosecution on federal sex trafficking charges and the GOP base has fractured over the administration’s handling of the case.

The divisions stem from a DOJ memo released in July that said, ‘This systematic review revealed no incriminating ‘client list.’ There was also no credible evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions. We did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties.’

Democrats have since seized on the discord with newfound calls for transparency in Epstein’s case, which Republicans have panned as hypocrisy.

An FBI public information officer declined to comment on the letter when the bureau was reached by Fox News Digital.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Related Posts

Midterm alarm bells: Democrats face steep favorability deficit despite election gains
Politics

Midterm alarm bells: Democrats face steep favorability deficit despite election gains

April 20, 2026
Trump’s apocalyptic Iran warning raises stakes for sweeping US strike threat
Politics

Trump’s apocalyptic Iran warning raises stakes for sweeping US strike threat

April 20, 2026
Graham eyes ‘down payment’ on Trump-backed SAVE Act without Democratic support
Politics

Graham eyes ‘down payment’ on Trump-backed SAVE Act without Democratic support

April 20, 2026
Democrat whose parents fled Iran moves to oust Hegseth
Politics

Democrat whose parents fled Iran moves to oust Hegseth

April 20, 2026
White House unleashes on Stacey Abrams in latest clash over Trump’s election order
Politics

White House unleashes on Stacey Abrams in latest clash over Trump’s election order

April 20, 2026
American journalist kidnapped in Iraq is set free, must leave country ‘immediately,’ her employer says
Politics

American journalist kidnapped in Iraq is set free, must leave country ‘immediately,’ her employer says

April 20, 2026
Next Post
Expert warns Democrats risk backlash over failure to condemn violent rhetoric in their ranks

Expert warns Democrats risk backlash over failure to condemn violent rhetoric in their ranks

    Become a VIP member by signing up for our newsletter. Enjoy exclusive content, early access to sales, and special offers just for you! As a VIP, you'll receive personalized updates, loyalty rewards, and invitations to private events. Elevate your experience and join our exclusive community today!

    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Disclaimer: InformedAmericanToday.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Categories

    • Business
    • Economy
    • Editor's Pick
    • Politics
    • Stock Market

    Recent Posts

    • Midterm alarm bells: Democrats face steep favorability deficit despite election gains
    • European tech shares tumble as China’s AI push spooks investors
    • What falling wage growth says about where the U.S. economy is heading
    • Italy’s MPS shares fall ahead of Mediobanca board meeting on bid
    • Terms and conditions
    • Privacy Policy

    Copyright © 2026 informedamericantoday.com | All Rights Reserved

    No Result
    View All Result
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Stock Market
    • Editor’s Choice

    Copyright © 2026 informedamericantoday.com | All Rights Reserved

    No Result
    View All Result
    • Politics
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Stock Market
    • Editor’s Choice

    Copyright © 2026 informedamericantoday.com | All Rights Reserved